1. meladoodle:

    i said brb to a guy on facebook 4 years ago and just now he replied ‘u back yet?’

    (via asian)

    1 hour ago  /  419,182 notes  /  Source: meladoodle

  2. chamelion-circuit:

foreverweddings:

 Because big, bulky boxes are not obvious at all. 

This is super smart

    chamelion-circuit:

    foreverweddings:

     Because big, bulky boxes are not obvious at all. 

    This is super smart

    (via condom)

    1 hour ago  /  17,091 notes  /  Source: foreverweddings

  3. trapkitten:

woodelf68:

Black Floofball with eyes.

Soot sprite

    trapkitten:

    woodelf68:

    Black Floofball with eyes.

    Soot sprite

    (via carry-on-my-wayward-butt)

    1 hour ago  /  303,833 notes  /  Source: luhnay

  4. sithisit:

truly inspirational

    sithisit:

    truly inspirational

    (via orgasmic-humor)

    1 hour ago  /  37,016 notes  /  Source: humortrain

  5. ultrafacts:

The name of the judge was Deborah Servitto, and this is the actual court ruling.



Mr. Bailey complains that his rep is trash
So he’s seeking compensation in the form of cash.
Bailey thinks he’s entitled to some monetary gain
Because Eminem used his name in vain.
Eminem says Bailey used to throw him around
Beat him up in the john, shoved his face in the ground.
Eminem contends that his rap is protected
By the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Eminem maintains that the story is true
And that Bailey beat him black and blue.
In the alternative he states that the story is phony
And a reasonable person would think it’s baloney.
The court must always balance the rights
Of a defendant and one placed in a false light.
If the plaintiff presents no question of fact
To dismiss is the only acceptable act.
If the language used is anything but pleasin’
It must be highly objectionable to a person of reason.
Even if objectionable and causing offense
Self-help is the first line of defense.
Yet when Bailey actually spoke to the press
What do you think he didn’t address?
Those false-light charges that so disturbed
Prompted from Bailey not a single word.
So highly objectionable, it could not be
Bailey was happy to hear his name on a CD.
Bailey also admitted he was a bully in youth
Which makes what Marshall said substantial truth.
This doctrine is a defense well known
And renders Bailey’s case substantially blown.
The lyrics are stories no one would take as fact
They’re an exaggeration of a childish act.
Any reasonable person could clearly see
That the lyrics could only be hyperbole.
It is therefore this court’s ultimate position
That Eminem is entitled to summary disposition.

Source
Follow Ultrafacts for more facts!

    ultrafacts:

    The name of the judge was Deborah Servitto, and this is the actual court ruling.

    Mr. Bailey complains that his rep is trash

    So he’s seeking compensation in the form of cash.

    Bailey thinks he’s entitled to some monetary gain

    Because Eminem used his name in vain.

    Eminem says Bailey used to throw him around

    Beat him up in the john, shoved his face in the ground.

    Eminem contends that his rap is protected

    By the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.

    Eminem maintains that the story is true

    And that Bailey beat him black and blue.

    In the alternative he states that the story is phony

    And a reasonable person would think it’s baloney.

    The court must always balance the rights

    Of a defendant and one placed in a false light.

    If the plaintiff presents no question of fact

    To dismiss is the only acceptable act.

    If the language used is anything but pleasin’

    It must be highly objectionable to a person of reason.

    Even if objectionable and causing offense

    Self-help is the first line of defense.

    Yet when Bailey actually spoke to the press

    What do you think he didn’t address?

    Those false-light charges that so disturbed

    Prompted from Bailey not a single word.

    So highly objectionable, it could not be

    Bailey was happy to hear his name on a CD.

    Bailey also admitted he was a bully in youth

    Which makes what Marshall said substantial truth.

    This doctrine is a defense well known

    And renders Bailey’s case substantially blown.

    The lyrics are stories no one would take as fact

    They’re an exaggeration of a childish act.

    Any reasonable person could clearly see

    That the lyrics could only be hyperbole.

    It is therefore this court’s ultimate position

    That Eminem is entitled to summary disposition.

    Source

    Follow Ultrafacts for more facts!

    (via seriously-youknow)

    9 hours ago  /  18,498 notes  /  Source: ultrafacts

  6. (via 10knotes)

    9 hours ago  /  97,513 notes  /  Source: littlebitofbass

  7. glasssoul:

    friends who like and play the same games as you but on a different platform

    image 

    (via thestrawhatpenguin)

    9 hours ago  /  118,990 notes  /  Source: cutespookydragon

  8. avialum:

    anime trope episodes: the beach episode, the festival episode, the episode where someone doesn’t know how to cook
    western cartoon trope episodes: the episode where someone has several copies of themselves made, the episode where inanimate objects come to life, the episode that is a homage to a movie from the 1950s, the episode where someone is shrunk down to microscopic levels and placed inside the body of another person

    (via spoopycecilos)

    9 hours ago  /  25,641 notes  /  Source: benepla

  9. refrgerator:

    later is the best time to do anything

    (via thingsthatmakeyoufeelkindaguilty)

    13 hours ago  /  672,940 notes  /  Source: trashboat

  10. ittlebitz:


starrysleeper:

Wait a minute…

I have been laughing at this for hours now…

    ittlebitz:

    starrysleeper:

    Wait a minute…

    I have been laughing at this for hours now…

    (via the-awkward-platypus)

    1 day ago  /  240,991 notes  /  Source: itscalledfashionlookitup